| 
      Is climate chaotic? It the chaotic behavior 
      limited in the atmosphere only? Or is it also in other elements of 
      the climate system, such as the oceans and cryosphere? Will the  
      chaotic behavior be amplified when the atmosphere is coupled together with 
      the oceans and cryosphere? Is there is a limit to our ability to predict 
      climate beyond a certain time range? To what extent, a climate model can 
      be simplified to produce the chaotic behavior?  Natural Variability. Will a chaotic 
      system always have a well defined attractor, i.e., a well defined 
      distribution describing the probability of occurrence of various climates? 
      Does the natural variability of climate arise from the climate system's 
      chaotic elements? Will the distribution itself be predictable beyond the 
      limit of deterministic predictability? Is the natural variability of the 
      climate system on time scales of decades and longer dependent on oceanic 
      and cryospheric processes only? How much do we understand this natural 
      variability based on paleoclimatic evidence?Errors in Initial Conditions. To what 
      extent does the ability to predict future behavior depend on the accuracy 
      of the knowledge of the system's initial state? How does the ability 
      differ for a chaotic or a non-chaotic system?  Do we know how 
      accurately we need to know the temperatures of the deep ocean today in 
      order to make a prediction of climate of a given accuracy, say, fifty 
      years in the future?  Given the long time scales of the deep ocean 
      circulations, the climate trends of the coming decades may be crucially 
      dependent on the history of climate during the last few centuries. What is 
      the extent of this dependence? Model Errors. Would our climate 
      predictions be hampered by the imperfect state of current climate models 
      even if the above factors did not introduce limits on our ability to 
      predict climate? Are there any coupled atmosphere-ocean general 
      circulation models which are able to reproduce a climate equilibrium like 
      the current climate without introducing artificial sources of heat, 
      moisture, and/or momentum at the interface between the atmosphere and the 
      oceans (i.e., "flux corrections")? Do we know the source or sources of 
      these errors? Why do you think the potential sources include inadequate 
      resolution of oceanic currents and eddies, and inadequate representations 
      of subgrid scale processes such as moist convection and clouds in the 
      atmosphere? The need to parameterize subgrid scale processes may introduce 
      severe limitations on our ability to represent these processes and their 
      impact on climate change, and we need to understand these limitations and 
      the resulting uncertainty.Can we trust what the climate models tell us and why? |